Wednesday, April 6, 2011

A Clash of Kings by George R. R. Martin [1998]

A Clash of Kings by George R. R. Martin

The second novel of Martin's titanic Song of Ice and Fire saga (A Game of Thrones, 1996) begins with Princess Arya Stark fleeing her dead father's capital of King's Landing, disguised as a boy. [...] In between [the beginning and the end], her actions map the further course of a truly epic fantasy set in a world bedecked with 8000 years of history, beset by an imminent winter that will last 10 years and bedazzled by swords and spells wielded to devastating effect by the scrupulous and unscrupulous alike. Standout characters besides Arya include Queen Cersei, so lacking in morals that she becomes almost pitiable; the queen's brother, the relentlessly ingenious dwarf Tyrion Lannister; and Arya's brother, Prince Brandon, crippled except when he runs with the wolves in his dreams. The novel is notable particularly for the lived-in quality of its world, created through abundant detail that dramatically increases narrative length even as it aids suspension of disbelief; for the comparatively modest role of magic (although with one ambitious young woman raising a trio of dragons, that may change in future volumes)... Martin may not rival Tolkien or Robert Jordan, but he ranks with such accomplished medievalists of fantasy as Poul Anderson and Gordon Dickson. Here, he provides a banquet for fantasy lovers with large appetites—and this is only the second course of a repast with no end in sight.

Author: George R. R. Martin
Series: A Song of Ice and Fire
Genre: Fantasy
Publisher: Bantam; First Edition edition (February 2, 1999)
Media type: Hardcover, Paperback, Kindle, Audio Book
Pages: 768 pages
ISBN-13: 978-0553108033
Followed by: A Storm of Swords
Preceded by: A Game of Thrones
Publication date: November 1998

Reviews



Hardcore Action, Hardcore Fantasy. No One Does it Better

During one of those endless nights when I just couldn't put Clash of Kings down, I wondered: "Why aren't there more books like this?" George Martin has created one of those most deeply involving and satisfying series out there. In only two books, he has crafted real characters involved in the horrors of war. Many of the reviews below accurately describe the way that Martin creates characters of grey, rather than comic book black and whites. Many of the scenes in the book fit well with dark and somber lighting. This is not your daddy's fantasy novel.

Martin's characters bring a more realistic spin on knighthood and war. Cersei describes it best to young Sansa when she destroys the young girl's romantic view of knights by remarking that knights are for killing, nothing more or less. And kill they do. The battle scenes are raw and unglamorous, like the opening scene from Saving Private Ryan. Its all very realistic and gritty and heck, it makes sense: what do you really think happens when a not-so-sharp sword is swung haphazardly at another person: I've never seen it firsthand, but I'm sure its not pretty. It may be an oxymoron to claim that a fantasy book can be realistic, but this series is: after seeing the battle scenes in Braveheart or Gladiator, I have a deeper understanding of the horrors of sword fighting in, say, the medieval times in English history. Martin's story is realistic in the sense that it doesn't gloss over the horror and pain and terror of battles and the rage of the people who fight them.

Martin's series is a hardcore fantasy adventure for adults. While other authors cater predominately to a younger fantasy audience, Martin seems to write for the "college and beyond" crowd (at 31, I'm well beyond). Sex scenes, like the battles, are not glamorous in the least. Whereas characters in Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series constantly blush and stumble at the very thought of even kissing a girl, Martin's characters think lewd thoughts, perform graphic sex scenes, etc. Yes, its not for all ages, or for every taste, but for those of us who are tired of the same old antiseptic stuff, Martin is a mature breathe of fresh air.

Meanwhile, he continues to awe me with his story telling. The different kings are now in open conflict with each other. Whereas Game of Thrones focused on the Starks v. the Lannisters, in this installment, it seems as if the entire land is in termoil, with no less than six kings fighting each other and attacking each other. The battles are terrific, including the climactic battle. (no spoilers here)

One other note I feel compelled to make is that Martin has created strong and independant female characters in his series. People might assume, based on the reviews, that this is a male-dominated story. Nothing could be further from the truth. Martin spends as much time writing about the female characters (Sansa, Arya, Catelyn Stark) as the male characters, and the female characters rule (i.e. Cersei) and fight battles (I won't reveal any specifics on this point except to say that Martin introduces two female warriors.)

Martin has created a real world, with all the vices of our own, and given all his characters life. Here's hoping that other writers take note.

- by Andres R. Guevara

 

This is the second book of The Song of Ice and Fire, Martin's giant fantasy series. The books are not self-contained; they're parts of one giant story, carrying plots, characters, and setup between books. Not only do you not want to read this one before A Game of Thrones, you ideally want to have read A Game of Thrones fairly recently so that you remember all of the plot complexity. Martin avoids any extended recaps, which is quite nice when reading the series but might be confusing if you're coming back to it after a while.

My reaction after the first book is even stronger with this one. Martin's story is slow, complex, and sprawling. It's a treat for those who love detailed plotting, intrigue, and political manuevering. Martin gives the politics enough time to develop, shows many of the details, and treats the reader to many camera angles. The primary drawback, though, is that many of the viewpoint characters just aren't interesting.

Last time, Dany, Arya, and Tyrion were the best characters. A Clash of Kings doesn't change that, and if anything their separation from the rest of the pack becomes more noticable. Jon's story bogs down in an slog through the cold wild north of the Wall, and while I'm sure the people he meets and the things he discovers there are going to be important, they weren't exciting to read about. Catelyn, Sansa, and the newly introduced Davos exist mostly to show additional camera angles on the action and get little characterization of their own (although at least Sansa becomes merely pathetic instead of actively infuriating). Theon (another new viewpoint character) is an idiot. Bran's story develops in some mildly interesting ways, but he spends rather too much time feeling sorry for himself and not enough time exploring the implications of his abilities.

That leaves the three best characters, and they're still a lot of fun. Tyrion is probably the best of this volume, particularly when he starts standing up to and manipulating some of the eviler members of his family. Through the first part of the book, while Arya is on the run and acting more like a typical young girl and Dany is hardly seen at all, I was reading the book mostly for the next Tyrion chapter. His scarcasm was a breath of fresh air.

Arya goes through a rough spot for interest at the beginning of the book, but then eventually gets her feet under her again, meets a fascinating character with his own special powers, and becomes an active part of the plot (finally). When Arya is using her training and acting the most adult, she's my favorite character in the book. She spends a lot of time acting like a young girl, though, and those parts aren't as interesting.

Dany seems to be having the most dramatic effect on the structure of the world, but doesn't get that much screen time (and a lot of that time is rather boring). Her adventures are still in a far different part of the world than everyone else, but it's through her that more magic is coming back into the world. This is never stated outright, but it's becoming obvious as of this book: this series will be more of a fantasy and less of a faux-historical intrigue as the series goes on. Martin is taking the Tolkien approach to magic rather than the D&D approach to magic, keeping it wonderous, unexplained, and mostly found in the form of strange creatures and places of power. That's good to see. Despite the structural similarities (including the over-long novel installments), Martin is trying to keep away from the cliches of epic fantasy and keep matters on a more gritty, if not quite realistic, level.

That being said, I didn't enjoy this book as much as the last, and despite the intricate plotting, I was quite disappointed in the ending. It lacks the thrill and triumph as the end of A Game of Thrones; in fact, there is barely a climax. Much of the last quarter is a recounting of a confused battle and I don't find detailed accounts of faux-medieval combat interesting.

Martin is, admirably, avoiding the standard coming-of-age, growing-power plot structure normally found in fantasy. (There are both coming-of-age stories and growing power, to be sure, but both are just threads of plot, not the center of the tapestry.) Characters either don't gain new abilities or gain them only slowly, and the good guys often lose. This opens the door for a more complex and original work, but it also means that the emotional resonances and dramatic tension that stock fantasy taps into aren't available.

This puts the weight of the story on the details of political intrigue and the interactions between the characters. Martin keeps the story lucid and well-paced, but I often don't find his characters up to the task of carrying my interest. I want more to happen, or more accurately more of true significance rather than a slow building block to a payoff 500 pages later or in the next volume. I also want more to happen to the characters I care about and fewer characters who are little but camera viewpoints. The result is vaguely frustrating and, despite the good pacing, horribly long.

I'm still in this series for at least one more book, probably two. It's staying better than average. But it's not grabbing me and pulling me into the next book.

- by Eyrie



A Clash of Kings is the second installment in the epic fantasy series, A Song of Ice and Fire, which George R.R. Martin began with the excellent A Game of Thrones. Martin is deeply inspired by English history in the late medieval period, more specifically the Wars of the Roses where the dynasties of Lancaster and York fought a long-drawn civil war about the throne of England. His historical inspiration was particularly conspicuous in A Game of Thrones, which in many respects reminded me of The Sunne in Splendour, Sharon K. Penman’s excellent historical novel about the Yorkist monarchs Edward IV and Richard III.
In Game of Thrones several of the main characters exhibit marked similarities with the historical figures depicted by Penman. Robert Baratheon, king of Westeros, thus strongly resembles Edward IV as he went to seed late in life, while his closest friend Eddard Stark, Hand of the King, shares many traits with Penman’s sympathetic portrait of Richard III. Furthermore, Robert’s queen, Cersei Lannister seems an amalgam of the Lancaster queen Margaret of Anjou and the Yorkist queen Elizabeth Wydeville. She shares the former’s aggressive ruthlessness and the latter’s beauty and avarice. Despite historical similarities of this kind, Martin’s series contains far more than a political conflict lifted from medieval history and transposed into fantasy-land, something which becomes abundantly clear with A Clash of Kings, where Martin sheds his obvious reliance on English history and instead develops the conflicts and characters he so admirably set in place in A Game of Thrones.

Following the events of A Game of Thrones, Westeros tethers on the brink of chaos and the fate of House Stark looks grim indeed. With Robert I Baratheon dead, the Iron Throne has passed to his teenage son Joffrey with his mother, the depraved Cersei as Queen Regent – her influence only tempered by her brother Tyrion’s position as Hand of the King. Other people, however, lay claim to the Iron Throne, arguing Joffrey’s bastardy. Robert’s brothers each claim kingship, while Robb, Eddard Stark’s eldest son, has been acclaimed King in the North, the ancient title of his House. With the spectre of civil war looming on the horizon, additional players eye a chance for power and glory. Thus old ambitions are revived and friendships betrayed when Balon Greyjoy of the Iron Islands claims kingship of his domain and embarks upon a war of conquest in the North. 

Lady Catelyn Stark does not have the luxury of mourning the death of her husband as her children need her. She counsels her son Robb in his war against the Iron Throne while she searches for a way to recover her daughters. Sansa Stark is still in the hands of the Lannisters. Betrothed to King Joffrey, Sansa is in reality a hostage who struggles to remain alive in the face of Joffrey’s increasingly unpredictable and cruel behaviour. Her sister Arya has escaped King’s Landing and together with a band of ragged children she attempts to reach her home at Winterfell, a journey that takes her through a countryside where many dangers lurk for the young and vulnerable. Yet while Westeros descend into civil war and treacherous intrigue, other threats against the kingdom lurk upon the horizon. In the far North, Jon Snow and the men of the Night’s Watch venture out beyond the Wall to assess the Wildling threat, and on the other side of the world Daenerys, the last of the Targaryens, nurtures her newly hatched dragons with vengeance in her heart. Other forces might have designs on Westeros as well since Stannis Baratheon, claimant to the Iron Throne, forsakes the gods of Westeros for R’hllor Lord of Light at the behest of Melisandre of Asshai, the god’s priestess and a woman of sorcerous powers.

A Clash of Kings is structured like its predecessor where each chapter is titled after the POV of its character – a move that ensures that the narrative, in itself very surprising and suspenseful, is firmly grounded in the characters and their development. Whereas A Game of Thrones set the scene and introduced the principal characters, Martin uses the second instalment of his series to develop his characters further, often by placing them in situations where they are forced to abandon ideas and sentiments that until now has served as the foundation of their respective identities. This strategy is employed most successfully in the cases of Sansa and Arya Stark. These girls have grown up sheltered by their noble ancestry as well as loved and indulged by those around them. They lost the security that their station provided when their father was executed as a traitor and each must now struggle to survive in a hostile world, and each must admit that their interpretation of their world and their identity has turned out to be illusory. 

Arya Stark, who was a stubborn and wilful tom-boy in A Game of Thrones, is now forced to adopt a disguise as a low-born boy when she, in the care of a man of the Night’s Watch, sets out for Winterfell in the North. Yet when her protector dies, she is left to fend for herself with a group of ragged boys in a hostile territory. When she and the boys cross paths with a company of brutal mercenaries, Arya learns a bitter lesson. She is, despite her fencing-lessons, vulnerable and powerless, and her only safety lies in the false identity she has assumed. Throughout the story, circumstances forces her to exchange one false identity for another and one cannot help to wonder what these bitter lessons in survival will do to her sense of self. Each change of identity strips something away from Arya of House Stark and this novel leaves her with a rather bleak-looking future.

Arya’s older sister Sansa also learns some very bitter lessons about the world and her place in it. The first book, A Game of Thrones, portrayed Sansa Stark as a romantically inclined and somewhat silly young girl who looked at the world through the rose-tinted glasses of courtly romance. For her the world was an endless pageant peopled with beautiful queens, handsome princes, fair maidens and true knights – and her almost wilful blindness towards the harsher aspects of the world frequently put her at odds with both her sister and her father. I have to admit that I didn’t much care for Sansa when I read A Game of Thrones. I found her incredibly shallow and naïve, and, frankly, very annoying – so it is really a testament to Martin’s talent that he in this novel puts her through such a thorough process of disillusionment that her chapters quickly became some of my favourite parts of A Clash of Kings. If Sansa’s eyes were firmly shut against the world during the previous book, they are now wide open – and she doesn’t like what she sees one bit. She can no longer explain away the cruelty and injustice she witnesses at Joffrey’s court and that she herself suffers at the behest of the golden-haired boy-king, who grows ever more violent and cruel. Joffrey is, in many respects, a textbook example of a sociopath with a penchant for sadism. Yet his social position is such that almost no one dares to speak against him. Instead, people jump to carry out his bizarre orders – even if it entails sworn knights beating up a defenceless young girl. 

Sansa is ultimately too powerless to be a really compelling character in her own right – at least not yet – but what is very interesting is the use Martin makes of her. He very effectively uses her experiences as a device for critically examining the medieval ideals of chivalry and courtly romance, a critique that is most tellingly revealed in her interactions with Sandor Clegane:
 Sansa hugged herself, suddenly cold. “Why are you always so hateful? I was thanking you…”
“Just as if I was one of those true knights you love so well, yes. What do you think a knight is for, girl? You think it’s all taking favors from ladies and looking fine in gold plate? Knights are for killing.” He laid the edge of his longsword against her neck, just under her ear. Sansa could feel the sharpness of the steel. “I killed my first man at twelve. I’ve lost count of how many I’ve killed since then. High lords with old names, fat rich men dressed in velvet, knights puffed up like bladders with their honors, yes, and women and children too – they’re all meat, and I’m the butcher. Let them have their lands and their gods and their gold. Let them have their sers.” Sandor Clegane spat at her feet to show her what he thought of that. “So long as I have this,” he said, lifting the sword from her throat, “there’s no man on earth I need fear.”
Sandor Clegane, a minor but deeply intriguing character, serves as a counterpoint to Sansa’s wide-eyed innocence, to which he is oddly drawn. This angry, cynical and deeply wounded man continually dogs Sansa’s steps, forcing her to strip away the glamour of romance and fantasy, showing her instead the brutal reality of a feudal world where might more often than not equals right. This critique of the ideal of chivalry is a current theme throughout the entire novel as Martin juxtaposes pageantry and harsh reality. Westeros indeed is a rather bleak world where good intentions and lofty ideals seldom last, a notion that is perhaps most poignantly voiced by Catelyn Stark’s assessment of Renly Baratheon’s court of summer knights:
They are still unblooded, Catelyn thought as she watched Lord Bryce goad Ser Robar into juggling a brace of daggers. It is all a game to them still, a tourney writ large, and all they see is the chance for glory and honor and spoils. They are boys drunk on song and story, and like all boys, they think themselves immortal.
“War will make them old,” Catelyn said, “as it did us.” […] “I pity them.”
“Why?” Lord Rowan asked her. “Look at them. They’re young and strong, full of life and laughter. […] Why pity?”
“Because it will not last,” Catelyn answered, sadly. “Because they are the knights of summer, and winter is coming.”
“Lady Catelyn, you are wrong.” Brienne regarded her with eyes as blue as her armour. “Winter will never come for the likes of us. Should we die in battle, they will surely sing of us, and it’s always summer in the songs. In the songs all knights are gallant, all maids are beautiful, and the sun is always shining.”
Winter comes for all of us, Catelyn thought.
In the end, however much they are cloaked in beautiful imagery and lofty ideals, knights serves their kings for the purpose of war, and the reality of war is neither gallant nor glorious. 

Another prominent feature of Martin’s novel is the politicking and intrigues that flourishes at the court in King’s Landing, and one particular player in the game of thrones is a personal favourite of mine: the cunning dwarf Tyrion Lannister whose irreverent humour makes him hard not to dislike. Tyrion is an extremely well-written character and in this novel Martin adds some new facets to this already interesting and complex man. Tyrion not only displays a talent for politic intrigue, he also exhibits a certain sense of honour and justice that his sister, Queen Cersei, sorely lacks. He treats Sansa with kindness and he tries to restrain Joffrey in his increasingly insane behaviour. Though firmly committed to the Lannister cause, Tyrion isn’t completely self-serving when it comes to government, unlike his sister Cersei who can’t seem to grasp the bigger picture and see that there has be a certain amount of justice and security in order to keep the kingdom together in the long-term. However, Tyrion’s political visions are constantly foiled by either the state of war or the need to curb the excesses of Cersei’s regency – a thing that only exacerbates the already strained relationship between the two siblings.

Tyrion’s chapters are invariably very entertaining to read. Martin’s forte is most definitely characterization but even among his many fine portraits in the Westerosi gallery of characters, Tyrion takes the price as one of the most complex, contradictory and likeable figures. He is clever, ambitious and opportunistic, but it seems like he has a huge chip on his shoulder and feels that he has something to prove, both to himself and to his father, the coldly distant Lord Tywin who casts a long shadow on both Tyrion and Cersei (one can’t help to wonder what kind of man he is, when one of his children callously states that the only way to keep your people loyal is to make certain that they fear you more than they do the enemy, a little piece of “wisdom” that she passes on to her son, who misinterprets is as fear is better than love!). There’s a lot of bitterness to Tyrion’s character, which often manifests itself in a tendency towards a rather snarky sarcasm – especially towards his scheeming sister whom he seemingly enjoys to antagonize. Yet he also has a more tender side, which his siblings appear to lack. This is most clearly shown in his relationship with his young mistress Shae and in his kindness towards Sansa.

Martin’s novel is an epic mastodon in every sense of the word – he portrays a world that moves ever closer to the brink of complete chaos while at the same time juggling multiple storylines and a large gallery of characters. Apart from those already mentioned, Daenerys Targaryen was a character that really fascinated me in the previous book. Martin put this young exiled princess through an amazing character-development, where she was married into a nomadic tribe of warriors, was widowed and, in an intense narrative climax, had her hatch tree dragonets from her husband’s funeral pyre. However, she doesn’t have that many chapters in A Clash of Kings and though her storyline takes her further eastward – thus expanding Martin’s world with tantalizing glimpses of strange and exotic cultures – I felt that her character-development had stalled somewhat.

Martin also develops Bran Stark’s storyline in a very interesting manner as this young boy slowly begins to come to terms with his disability. Like his sisters, Bran is forced to re-evaluate not only his dreams and hopes, but also his very identity. Because of his disability he can no longer hope to become a knight. Bran’s story is, however, not wholly depressing as Martin introduces Jojen Green, a boy with prophetic dreams, into the storyline, which opens up some very interesting possibilities regarding Bran’s future development – something that is further supported by the unique manner in which Bran’s bond with his direwolf Summer develops.

Despite a character gallery that is already quite large, Martin adds two new POV in A Clash of Kings: Theon Greyjoy, son of Lord Balon Greyjoy of the Iron Isles and ward of Lord Eddard Stark, and Ser Davos Seaworth, a knight of Stannis Baratheon’s court at Dragonstone. Theon’s POV gives the reader a very interesting glimpse of the Viking-like culture of the Iron Isles and Davos’ POV not only gives a portrait of one of the major contenders for the Iron Throne (the harsh and stiff-necked Stannis), it adds a whole extra level of complexity to an already convoluted plot by introducing a new player in the game of thrones – the beautiful and sinister priestess Melisandra of Asshai, a woman whose motivations and powers remain cloaked in mystery throughout the novel.

Martin manages the multiple plotlines of A Clash of Kings quite expertly by carefully maintaining a continuing level of suspense throughout the different story-arcs. While intensely character-driven, the novel maintains a very high level of narrative tension that never falters – with some truly shocking plot twists along the way. I was completely hooked from the beginning and found it very difficult to put the book down, wreaking complete havoc with my sleeping patterns!

Martin is quite deservedly praised for his skills at characterization, but one of the most impressive aspects of A Song of Ice and Fire is, in my opinion, is his world-building. As stated in my introduction, Martin has created Westeros strongly inspired by the dynastic civil wars that plagued England during the late 15th century and he has drawn on a truly impressive knowledge of the late medieval period to impart his world with texture and depth. When reading A Song of Ice and Fire it quickly becomes clear that Martin know quite a lot about not only medieval warfare but also the details of daily life in a feudal society – both in terms of the aristocracy and of the peasant population. What is even more impressive is the fact that he has taken great pains to re-create a distinctly medieval mindset for his characters, something that is rarely seen in the type of fantasy fiction that often utilizes a pseudo-medieval setting. In many respects, A Clash of Kings, reads like a historical novel because the wealth of historical detail imparts the story with a high degree of verisimilitude, and it is really quite impressive how “real” the imagined world of Westeros feels. With Westeros Martin has created a believable medieval secondary-world fantasy that incorporates both the glamorous and romantic imagery of feudal ideology and the harsh and brutal aspects of a low-tech world based primarily on agriculture and warfare – a world were family allegiance often takes priority over other bonds of loyalty, where marriage is a matter of politics and strategic alliance and where girls as young as twelve are considered marriageable. It is very important to keep these things in mind when reading these books, because Martin’s characters cannot be evaluated according to modern standards, and it is truly very impressive that Martin successfully manages to create riveting and emotionally appealing characters with a mindset that often is quite alien to modern readers.

On all accounts, A Clash of Kings offers an intense, enjoyable and hugely satisfying reading experience. It offers a number of finely wrought characters and a fully formed medieval world, whose historical “feel” is perfectly off-set by some rare touches of magic, which imparts the story with a certain aura of “enchantment” that often is very hard to find – it is for me, at least. Last but not least, the novel offers a deeply captivating story that made this book very hard to put down and sent me directly to the book store to get the next instalment. A Song of Ice and Fire is some of the best fantasy that I’ve read in years and I can only concur with the widespread opinion that George R.R. Martin is a modern master of the epic fantasy.

- by BSC Review

A Game of Thrones by George R. R. Martin [1996]

A Game of Thrones by George R. R. Martin

In a world where the approaching winter will last four decades, kings and queens, knights and renegades struggle for control of a throne. Some fight with sword and mace, others with magic and poison. Beyond the Wall to the north, meanwhile, the Others are preparing their army of the dead to march south as the warmth of summer drains from the land. After more than a decade devoted primarily to TV and screen work, Martin (The Armageddon Rag, 1983) makes a triumphant return to high fantasy with this extraordinarily rich new novel, the first of a trilogy. Although conventional in form, the book stands out from similar work by Eddings, Brooks and others by virtue of its superbly developed characters, accomplished prose and sheer bloody-mindedness. Although the romance of chivalry is central to the culture of the Seven Kingdoms, and tournaments, derring-do and handsome knights abound, these trappings merely give cover to dangerous men and women who will stop at nothing to achieve their goals. When Lord Stark of Winterfell, an honest man, comes south to act as the King's chief councilor, no amount of heroism or good intentions can keep the realm under control. It is fascinating to watch Martin's characters mature and grow, particularly Stark's children, who stand at the center of the book. Martin's trophy case is already stuffed with major prizes, including Hugos, Nebulas, Locus Awards and a Bram Stoker. He's probably going to have to add another shelf, at least.


Author: George R. R. Martin
Series: A Song of Ice and Fire
Genre: Fantasy
Publisher: Bantam; First edition (August 1, 1996)
Media type: Hardcover, Paperback, Kindle, Audio Book
Pages: 704 pages
ISBN-13: 978-0553103540
Followed by: A Clash of Kings
Publication date: 6 August 1996

Reader Review



Well plotted and paced; excellent, fresh fantasy tale
 
First off, I'm a heavy duty fan of GRRM. I've read over a 100 different fantasy authors in my time (started at 12; I'm now 32). Took about 5 years off from the genre b/c I felt it was all getting too formulaic and cliched.

So, when I came back to fantasy at the end of 1999, I read the usual: Goodkind, Jordan, etc. and then someone told me about GRRM and man, that was the kicker!

Here are the reasons to choose GRRM. I've also listed the reasons not to choose him to make it fair b/c I know their are certain personalities who won't like this series:

WHY TO READ GRRM

(1) YOU ARE TIRED OF FORMULAIC FANTASY: good lad beats the dark lord against impossible odds; boy is the epitome of good; he and all his friends never die even though they go through great dangers . . . the good and noble king; the beautiful princess who falls in love with the commoner boy even though their stations are drastically different . . . you get the idea. After reading this over and over, it gets old.

(2) YOU ARE TIRED OF ALL THE HEROES STAYING ALIVE EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE UNDER CONSTANT DANGER: this gets even worse where the author kills a main hero off but that person comes back later in the story. Or, a hero does die but magic brings him back.

This sometimes carries to minor characters where even they may not die, but most fantasy authors like to kill them off to show that some risked the adventure and perished.

(3) YOU ARE A MEDIEVAL HISTORY BUFF: this story was influenced by the WARS OF THE ROSES and THE HUNDRED YEARS WAR.

(4) YOU LOVE SERIOUS INTRIGUE WITHOUT STUPID OPPONENTS: lots of layering; lots of intrigue; lots of clever players in the game of thrones. Unlike other fantasy novels, one side, usually the villain, is stupid or not too bright.

(5) YOU ARE INTERESTED IN BIASED OPINIONS AND DIFFERENT TRUTHS: GRRM has set this up where each chapter has the title of one character and the whole chapter is through their viewpoint. Interesting tidbit is that you get their perception of events or truths. But, if you pay attention, someone else will mention a different angle of truth in the story that we rarely see in other novels. Lastly and most importantly, GRRM doesn't try to tell us which person is right in their perception. He purposelly leaves it vague so that we are kept guessing.

(6) LEGENDS: some of the most interesting characters are those who are long gone or dead. We never get the entire story but only bits and pieces; something that other fantasy authors could learn from to heighten suspense. Additionally, b/c the points of views are not congruent, we sometimes get different opinions.

(7) WORDPLAY: if you're big on metaphors and description, GRRM is your guy. Almost flawless flow.

(8) LOTS OF CONFLICT: all types, too; not just fighting but between characters through threats and intrigue.

(9) MULTILAYERED PLOTTING; SUB PLOTS GALORE: each character has their own separate storyline; especially as the story continues and everyone gets scattered. This is one of the reasons why each novel is between 700-900 pages.

(10) SUPERLATIVE VARIED CHARACTERS: not the typical archetypes that we are used to in most fantasy; some are gritty; few are totally evil or good; GRRM does a great job of changing our opinions of characters as the series progress. This is especially true of Jaime in book three.

(11) REALISTIC MEDIEVAL DIALOGUE: not to the point that we can't understand it but well done.

(12) HEAPS OF SYMOBLISM AND PROPHECY: if you're big on that.

(13) EXCELLENT MYSTERIES: very hard to figure out the culprits; GRRM must have read a lot of mystery novels.

(14) RICHLY TEXTURED FEMALE CHARACTERS: best male author on female characters I have read; realistic on how women think, too.

(15) LOW MAGIC WORLD: magic is low key; not over the top so heroes can't get out of jams with it.

REASON TO NOT READ GRRM

(1) YOU LIKE YOUR MAIN CHARACTERS: GRRM does a good job of creating more likeable characters after a few die. But, if that isn't your style, you shouldn't be reading it. He kills off several, not just one, so be warned.

(2) DO NOT CARE FOR GRITTY GRAY CHARACTERS: if you like more white and gray characters, this may unsettle you. I suggest Feist or Goodkind or Dragonlance if you want a more straight forward story with strong archetypes.

(3) MULTIPLE POINTS OF VIEWS TURN YOU OFF: if you prefer that the POVS only go to a few characters, this might be confusing for you.

(4) SWEARING, SEX: there's a lot of it in this book just as there is in real life.

(5) YOU DEMAND CLOSURE AT THE END OF EVERY BOOK: this isn't the case for all stories in the series. Some are still going on; some have been resolved; others have been created and are moving on.

(6) IF YOU WANT A TARGET OR SOMEONE TO BLAME: this can be done to some extent but not as much. This is b/c he doesn't try to make anyone necessarily good or evil.

(7) ARCHETYPES: some readers like archetypal characters because it's comfortable; we like the good young hero (sort of like Pug in Feist's THE RIFTWAR SAGA); it's familiar and we sometimes like to pretend we're this upcoming, great hero. You wont' get much of this in GRRM with the exception of one or two characters.

(8) LENGTH: you don't want to get into a long fantasy epic series. In that case, look for shorters works as this is biiig.

(9) PATRIARCHY: men are most of the main characters with lots of power (one female exception).

- by MISTER SJEM "sonofhotpie"



 

Exceeded my wildest expectations...and I expect a *lot*.

I see where a reviewer below faulted A GAME OF THRONES for being so chock-full of "tragedy, bloodshed, cruelty, death, rape, incest, drunkeness, murder, (and) infanticide."

Heh. Where I come from, that's a five-star recommendation.

Glibness aside, the person has a point. A GAME OF THRONES is indeed a graphic, viciously unsentimental novel. It features all the offenses listed above and more besides. It revels in them.

Can't you people see? That's the *point.*

The writers of heroic fantasy like to write about huge and epic struggles between capital-letter Good and Evil. Yet over and over again they demonstrate only the most puerile understanding of what good and evil actually are. In their blinkered, constrained little worlds, "evil" consists of sitting in a dank tower all day sending orcs or demons or what-have-you after the Crampon of Justice or some similarly-named hogwash artifact. Not even the darkest of their generic Dark Lords would be caught boffing his own sister or murdering a child (much less get away with it), and in that fundamentally nonsensical bit of characterization lies the crux of their problem: by sticking horns and a lightning staff onto a one-dimensional pulp villain and calling it Ultimate Evil, they cheapen and debase *real* good and evil.

I'm sure most of these writers realize this perfectly well; the problem is that they're writing to one of the most idiotically attenuated audiences on the face of the planet, people who really want to read the same book over and over ad infinitum with just enough variation from the template to create the illusion of difference. It's a sad state of affairs when we consider that fantasy, which should rightly be the domain of myth, wonder, and what Warren Ellis calls "mad, beautiful ideas," is the second most rigidly unimaginative genre out there (right behind romance, with whom it shares more than a few readers and tropes).

The "Song of Ice and Fire" series is a show-stopping six volume call to arms against this nonsense. Readers who come to the novels expecting another eminently predictable generic quest might be lulled to quiescence in the first few innocuous chapters, but will awake - sooner or later - to the unsettling realization that they're playing George R.R. Martin's game now. In A GAME OF THRONES, he systematically slaughters every sacred cow of "heroic fantasy" and, in so doing, injects a vigor and a zest for life and the written word into the genre that hasn't been seen since the beautiful insanity of Tolkien. Heroes die and villains turn out to be not so bad after all. Magic appears only very rarely, making it infinitely more interesting. The plot steadfastly refuses to go where you'd expect. And lest you purists think that Martin holds fantasy in contempt, consider this: unlike practically every other fantasy writer out there, he's gone to the trouble of writing this novel as if it were the most serious literature: his characters and their motivations are fully fleshed out (Eddard Stark and Tyrion Lannister are especially well-done), his prose is exciting and full of witty and lovely turns of phrase, and his themes are complex and multilayered. In other words, he's actually assumed that his readership is *intelligent.*

After reading this and China Meiville's PERDIDO STREET STATION, I have renewed hope for the future of fantasy. Works like these deserve to be read, reread, and passed to friends; they yank the genre - and its readers - out of bed and lead it blinking and cursing into the light of genuine literary merit.

- by Jacob G Corbin



After a hiatus from SF and fantasy fiction writing spent working in television, George R.R. Martin came home. And — who'd have thunk it? — he threw his hat into the epic fantasy ring with jaw-dropping results, beating Brooks, Jordan, Goodkind, et al at their own game with the effortless confidence of a consummate, seasoned pro. It's almost as if Martin was saying to himself, "Well, I guess I better show these kids how it's done."

A Game of Thrones is a knockout, a bullseye, a touchdown, a home run with bases loaded. A gargantuan fantasy saga set in a world where seasons last years, it earns the right to be called an epic by virtue of its sweeping and engrossing story, and the most believable and human cast of characters to populate a fantasy this side of Guy Gavriel Kay. Sure, it's a bit of a chore to keep track of all of them, but Martin rewards stalwart readers with the kind of storytelling most fantasy writers can only dream of pulling off. Multiple plotlines abound, intrigues pile upon intrigues, and virtually none of it flags or falters despite the book's nearly 900-page length. While many authors seem to think that all you have to do to write an epic fantasy is make it really, really long, Martin knows you've gotta fill all those pages with a narrative that engaginges your readers' hearts and minds, their empathy and their intellect, and keeps them glued.

Martin's epic is set in the Seven Kingdoms of Westeros, on a world in which summers can last a decade or more, and winters nearly a century. Eddard Stark is lord of the Keep of Winterfell, who finds himself hosting a surprise visit from his old friend and king of all the realm, Robert Baratheon. Eddard once aided Robert in an uprising against the ruling Targaryens, and only he seems aware just how dangerous Robert's queen, Cersei Lannister, and indeed the entire Lannister House, really is. Cersei has designs upon the throne for her snot of a son, Joffrey, and will evidently stop at nothing to achieve her ends. King Robert asks Eddard to take the position of King's Hand — sort of like his prime minister — as the previous hand, Jon Arryn, has met with an untimely death. Eddard accepts only out of duty, for his wife Catelyn has told him that her sister, Arryn's widow, is convinced Queen Cersei is behind his poisoning. Robert, though he dislikes his wife, remains blissfully ignorant of the extent of her intrigues.

Eddard's appointment begins under a cloud. One of his youngest sons, Bran, nearly dies in a horrible fall that leaves him paralyzed and comatose, and which we know was no accident. Bran has inadvertently stumbled upon one of Cersei's darkest secrets, and nearly pays with his life. After Eddard is miles away from Winterfell, at court in King's Landing, Bran awakens from his stupor, and though he cannot remember what it was he saw, Catelyn and the eldest Stark son, Robb, are now convinced that the Lannisters are up to absolutely no good. Catelyn hurries off to King's Landing to warn her husband, leaving Robb in charge of Winterfell, a 15-year-old boy suddenly thrust into the position of Lord.

It is easy to forget just how hard it is in a novel to create a living, breathing, fully three-dimensional character until you see it done by a genuinely gifted talent. Among the more memorable players in this game are Tyrion Lannister, the black sheep of the Lannister clan, stunted by dwarfism. At first the one member of Cersei's family remotely sympathetic to the Starks, he finds himself swept up in the growing turmoil between the two families until all of his skills at conniving must be brought to bear simply to stay alive. Jon Snow, a bastard son of Eddard's, rejected by Catelyn, joins the Night's Watch, a legion whose duty it is to guard an immense wall far to the north, beyond which lies a fearsome supernatural threat to the Seven Kingdoms. And in a fascinating subplot, we meet princess Daenerys Targaryen, one of the last surviving heirs to that unseated regime. Living in exile in a land far across the ocean (the book doesn't even provide a map to it) and having been wedded to a savage but noble warlord, she dreams of returning to her homeland one day and seeing the Targaryen name and its power restored.

Martin has an ability to go for the gut that most of his contemporaries in the fantasy genre simply lack, because they also happen to lack his character development skills. Whether in its bloody and savage battle scenes or in its intimate portrayal of the bonds of family and brotherhood, A Game of Thrones has a raw emotional force that hits you where it counts while avoiding the graphic excesses of, say, Terry Goodkind. Much of the time you do feel you're being manipulated — there are certain characters you simply want to see die in the most agonizing possible way, and occasionally Martin pays off — but it's being done so expertly you don't mind.

There is an exhilarating quality to this story that has been absent in fantasy, which has in turns been stultifed by literary pretensions or hamstrung by recursive, self-referential humor, for who knows how long. Martin's tale mostly dispenses with such post-Tolkien clichés as wizards and elves and spells and dark lords, turning its focus to real people and only hinting at supernatural or mystical goings-on behind the scenes. Thus the whole saga feels more like historical fiction than formula fantasy. In spite of its length, one factor for which I criticize epic fantasies on general principle most of the time, the book almost never flags in its pace. Martin's conceit of finishing most of his chapters with a cliffhanger keeps you wired, athough the multicharacter and multiplot nature of the story can make it terribly frustrating when you're presented with a shocking turn of events only to be suddenly thrust into another scene, without being able to get any sort of resolution for another 60 or so pages. But mostly, Martin balances his story well, leaving, in the end, only a few characters' narratives lacking closure — a situation successfully calculated to have you clamoring for the next book.

Dazzling in the scope of its legendry and in its heartfelt humanity, A Game of Thrones signals the onset of perhaps the most significant work of fantasy since Bilbo found the One Ring. True, that is a claim that critics and readers have made time and time again about virtually every fantasy saga to see print, but until now, in all honesty, it's been hyperbole. With A Song of Ice and Fire, it may well be true. This is one that will go beyond the status of bestseller into honest-to-goodness classic.

- by SF Reviews

Saturday, April 2, 2011

As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner [1930]



Faulkner's distinctive narrative structures--the uses of multiple points of view and the inner psychological voices of the characters--in one of its most successful incarnations here in As I Lay Dying. In the story, the members of the Bundren family must take the body of Addie, matriarch of the family, to the town where Addie wanted to be buried. Along the way, we listen to each of the members on the macabre pilgrimage, while Faulkner heaps upon them various flavors of disaster. Contains the famous chapter completing the equation about mothers and fish--you'll see.

Author: William Faulkner
Genre: Novel
Publisher: Modern Library (November 28, 2000)
Media type: Hardcover, Paperback, Kindle, Audio Book
Pages: 288 pages
ISBN-13: 978-0375504525
Original publication date: 1930

Reader Review



Faulkner with training wheels: helmet still advised ;-)

To quote the briefest chapter, the one that would surely catch your eye if you picked it off a shelf and skimmed through it: "My mother is a fish."

As with his stunning _The_Sound_and_the_Fury_ and _Absalom_Absalom_, this book makes use of the author's masterful use of stream-of-conscious writing to render an entire reality with internal monologues. The story unfolds as you construct it from the observations and responses of the characters. Though briefer and less challenging than these other two books, it's as absorbing a read as they have been for decades. When you reach the end, you can imagine that you'll pick up the book again someday, sure there's more to explore.

The structure is simple once you get the hang of it. Each chapter is the name of a particular character in the story of the family of Addie Bundren, dead in the first few pages, and being transported by her clan to the land of her birth for burial-by wagon, in the heat and dust, over rivers, for weeks, before the vacuum seal... There is no "Once upon a time." Instead, whatever that character is thinking at the instant the chapter begins is what you're reading. Soon, you know who everyone is and what she thinks of everyone else. The effect of this structure is that you can inhabit the narrative as each of the players, can see how events are interpreted differently. It's also like a mystery-someone will have troubled thoughts about something you can't quite distinguish; then, twenty pages later, you figure out what they've been talking about and you flip backward in a frenzy to see how the early references to the issue flesh out the story. This is a terribly rewarding way of reading.

This is a great first Faulkner for everyone. You develop the ability to read his complex novels by virtue of the simplicity of the story and the mostly brief chapters, each from a fresh point of view. You learn to read on if you don't get something. (Important skill: Faulkner is one of my absolute favorite authors since high school, and one of my favorite things is that you have to trust the story to tell you what you need to know in time. Not only do you get the reward of context for the occasional non sequitur, but you have the thrill of anticipation when something weird happens. This book is a great example of how, unlike Hemingway, where you have to read a basically boring story over and over to understand all the juicy stuff, Faulkner gives you nibbles of fantastic plot to hold you through the ultimate analysis.

- by notaprofessional



Rubbernecking on the Literary Highway

I was re-reading this book last week, pen and highlighter in hand, when my husband walked into the living room and said, "What are you reading?" I lifted the cover. "Is it any good?" To which I replied, "No," and he responded, "Why are you reading it?" And, slightly irritated, I said, "For the same reason you are watching the American Idol Audition show. It's DEFINITELY not good, but you can't look away."

And so it is with most of Faulkner's work. As a reader, you should not go into his work expecting anything "good." You won't find an easy or clear plotline, clear language, or (and this is USUALLY a major gripe of mine) likeable characters. But even though you don't really like what you are reading, you just have to know how it ends. You have to know what makes these reprehensible people tick. And, surprisingly enough, you are usually unsatisfied in the end, but not so much that you don't want to double back and have one more look at the car-wreck that is the work of Faulkner.

And so it is with *As I Lay Dying*. It's a fascinating piece of work, masterfully crafted, ultimately depressing, and darkly funny all at once. Having been to Rowan Oak a few times, I can see Faulkner sitting in his front garden chuckling over the idea of Vardaman's infamous "My Mother is a fish," chapter and how it captivated the world with it's "brilliance."

I also have no doubt, having grown up in Mississippi, that he was writing about real people, warts and all. I'm probably related to some of them. Maybe for that reason, Faulkner reads a little differently to locals. While I certainly appreciate his literary genius, the truth and realism of what he wrote also shines through. Reading Faulkner is a little like attending a funeral in Mississippi, something that closely resembles a family reunion set anywhere else - everybody's talking at once (in the most genteel manner, except for that blacksheep son - we all know he's not his Daddy's child, bless his heart - who keeps using bad language) about stuff that would absolutely curl the toenails of anyone is polite "society." The stream-of-consciousness style reminds me very much of what I picked up on as a child overhearing these conversations in the viewing room of the funeral parlor.

So . . . read with an open mind. And if the humor throws you at first, find a copy of the short story of *A Rose for Emily*. It will help you to better understand what Faulkner considered funny. Though off on other literary journeys, I'm sure that eventually my morbid curiousity will draw me back to this trainwreck again before too long . . . just can't stop looking . . .

- by Alesha N. Gates "Christian, Mother, Daughter, Teacher, Friend"


 

My mother is a fish

As I Lay Dying came right on the heels of The Sound And The Fury, and carried that novel's main stylistic technique - the distortion of time and truth by means of the varying, highly subjective viewpoints of completely different narrators - to its logical conclusion. While its predecessor contained a whole section told from the third person, in an attempt to clarify the wild images and impressions roiling in the other sections, As I Lay Dying is told in its entirety in the first person, by fifteen different people, each of whom talks for about four pages at a time. These are people in some way connected to the Bundren family, who got together to take the dead body of their matriarch Addie Bundren to her hometown of Jefferson for burial, in accordance with a longtime wish of hers. Inevitably, chaos ensues, as not one of the family members particularly cares for any of the others, many of them have their own hidden problems eating them from the inside, and there are plenty of things to hamper their progress along the way.

Despite all that has been said about Faulkner's "difficulty," this is not a difficult novel to read. It's certainly much easier than Benjy's or Quentin's chapters in The Sound And The Fury, and those were still comprehensible (after a bit of effort). You are told at the beginning of each monologue who will be talking, and although the prose gets rather oblique rather often, Faulkner does not resort to that cheap modernist trick of convoluted, excessively complex or just completely invented verbiage. The words are simple; it's what they mean that's complicated. The extreme subjectivity, however, sometimes has an unintended negative effect: the scene where the Bundrens try to get across a swollen river should have been gripping, but comes across as muddled.

In order for this novel to have been a complete success, it was necessary to give each narrator a truly unique and distinctive voice. And here is where Faulkner was put to a real test. It's not easy, after all, to write from fifteen wholly unique perspectives. What's surprising is the extent to which he succeeded: you can recognize Anse's hypocrisy, Cash's levelheadedness and sympathy, Cora's superciliousness and Darl's alienation when you see them without having to check the title of the chapter. Dewey Dell's monologues are always more scattered, more impressionistic and more colourful than any others; perhaps Faulkner was making the point that women think in a fundamentally different, more turbulent and more beautiful, way than men. However, he stumbled when creating Vardaman's perspective, which is neither as believable nor as distinct as the others. And many of the less important narrators all sound like watered-down Jason Compsons. In addition, Faulkner occasionally falls into the trap of self-indulgence, most frequently during Darl's existential soliloquies concerning the nature of "is" and "was." These are neither credible nor insightful. Nor is Darl's end particularly convincing; though the events of the book understandably agitate him, what he supposedly does goes against the state of his mind as shown in his chapters.

There are some rather fine parts in As I Lay Dying. Darl's last monologue is just plain disturbing. Peabody's rage at Anse perfectly reflects the sentiments of the reader. Dewey Dell's inner dilemma is affecting. The dialogue is very well written. However, it isn't a _great_ novel. It lacks the tempestuous passions flying in The Sound And The Fury. It isn't as consistently compelling as that novel. It also lacks that novel's doomy atmosphere, its proud epic feel, its moments of reflection and its occasional stabbing poignancy. Basically, the stylistic achievement makes it a worthy step forward, but it is not as illuminating, as powerful or as original as its predecessor, and it isn't an unqualified success.

- by Angry Mofo "angrymofo"


Friday, April 1, 2011

Matterhorn: A Novel of the Vietnam War by Karl Marlantes [2010]

Matterhorn: A Novel of the Vietnam War by Karl Marlantes

Matterhorn is a marvel--a living, breathing book with Lieutenant Waino Mellas and the men of Bravo Company at its raw and battered heart. Karl Marlantes doesn't introduce you to Vietnam in his brilliant war epic--he unceremoniously drops you into the jungle, disoriented and dripping with leeches, with only the newbie lieutenant as your guide. Mellas is a bundle of anxiety and ambition, a college kid who never imagined being part of a "war that none of his friends thought was worth fighting," who realized too late that "because of his desire to look good coming home from a war, he might never come home at all." A highly decorated Vietnam veteran himself, Marlantes brings the horrors and heroism of war to life with the finesse of a seasoned writer, exposing not just the things they carry, but the fears they bury, the friends they lose, and the men they follow. Matterhorn is as much about the development of Mellas from boy to man, from the kind of man you fight beside to the man you fight for, as it is about the war itself. Through his untrained eyes, readers gain a new perspective on the ravages of war, the politics and bureaucracy of the military, and the peculiar beauty of brotherhood.


Author: Karl Marlantes
Genre: War novel
Publisher: Atlantic Monthly Press
Media type: Hardcover, Paperback, Kindle, Audio Book
Pages: 592 pages
ISBN-13: 978-0802119285
Publication date: March 2010


Reader Review


Matterhorn - A grunts view
I am not qualified, so I will not attempt a literary review of the book "Matterhorn". What I am qualified to comment on is the authenticity of this novel. I was in Vietnam at the same time the author was, our experience differed mainly in the name of our units. Marlantes was in Charlie 1/4, I was in Alpha 1/4. It's all so accurate, so real, and brought back a flood of memories from my time in the jungle. If a person wants to know what it was like to be a grunt in a Marine Corps rifle Co in I Corps in the Republic of Vietnam in the late 60's, then read "Matterhorn". I cannot express how impressed I was by this novel. Mr. Marlantes NAILED it. He wrote my story, and the story of the men I humped those jungle trails with, the men I fought, cried, and died with. Thank you Sir.
- by Rodger Clemons


A story within a story, within a story
Although it's true that Matterhorn: A Novel of the Vietnam War isn't your ordinary war novel, it will give the reader an historically accurate and alarming vivid experience of the conflict that took place over 40 years ago in South East Asia. Just like other books of this type, the person who reads this 622 page book will be taken through the lives of teen boy's as they struggle with the reality of becoming a Marine, their painfully rapid acceleration into adulthood and too often their seemingly meaningless demise. As in other stories about war it has all of the usual components like the deep comradery between solders, the sorrow of loss, the intense fear of battle and the excitement of combat. Readers of this genre will not be disappointed. However, author Karl Marlantes has gone above, beyond and far deeper with Matterhorn than the ordinary war novel.
In this book about the Vietnam War, is another book about humanity and humility, and yet another about the complexities of racism. What also immerges within these pages is another story laced with subtle religious symbolism and the effects of a sacrosanct ideology. Even a rendition of a well-known allegorical tales is exquisitely presented as still another story in this winning novel.

The individually unique characters in this book grapple with meaning; the meaning of leadership, the meaning of reason, the meaning of war, the meaning of death and the meaning of life. Human dilemmas such as honor vs. cowardice, morality vs. malice, feminine vs. masculine and belief vs. doubt are painstaking studied and flushed out through the rich personalities portrayed within. It's also important to note Marlantes has captured, as only a combat veteran could, the quick wit and primordial humor present between soldiers during wartime.

The author brings you along as Second Lieutenant Waino Mellas, the man character, goes through profound physical, psychological and developmental transformations.
We meet Mellas with a detailed description of his appearance. He's donned in a new flak jacket, embarrassingly shiny new boots and the "...dark green t-shirt and boxer shorts his mother had dyed for him just three weeks ago..." We also join in with his thoughts.

"Forty new names and faces in his platoon alone, close to 200 in the company, and they all look the same, black or white. It overwhelmed him. They all wore the same filthy tattered camouflage, with no rank or insignia, no way of distinguishing them, from the skipper right on down. All of them were too thin, too young and too exhausted."

Another carefully crafted character is Hawke, an older Marine at 22 with a large red moustache who is filled with the kind of wisdom born out of experience.
`
"Hawke had been in-country long enough to be accustomed to being scared and waiting--that came with every operation--but he was not used to being worried, and that worried him".

The relationship between these two men at first tenuous, grows with a need for survival and the kind of respect only shared by those who have endured what many only experience in their worst nightmares.

Some of the other personalities that Marlantes has expertly woven into this human drama are: Lieutenant Colonel Simpson a despicable alcoholic who the reader can't help but pity, Vancouver who has chosen to live life on his own terms, Cassidy the hard and bitter gunny, Doc Fredrickson and senor squid Sheller both who use the minimal medical supplies, their dedication and their compassion to help gravely wounded soldiers, Hippy "... a creature of unknown order, a spirit carried by crippled feat..." and the self assured Lieutenant Karen Elsked, an integral part of the parable within this story of war. These are only a few of the cast of characters superbly developed in Matterhorn.

The fine and clear word smithing in this novel brings the reader into the jungles of the Quang-Tri Province of Vietnam. You can smell the freshly cut bamboo, feel the sting of ant bites, shiver as the leeches slide under your utility shirt, and see the "...fine faint plume...darker grayish silver cloud hardly distinguishable from the overcast backdrop.." of Agent Orange. As night or rain falls you experience the wet, the cold

Reading Marlantes's vivid words have you feeling the pain of jungle rot, emersion foot, starving hunger, debilitating thirst and the pummeling of mortars.

"Another explosion hit only 15 feet from their hole, followed by four more. They winced with the pain as the concussion slapped against their eardrums. Mellas felt the air rush from his lungs. He felt he was in a heavy black bag being beaten with unseen clubs. Shrapnel hissed overhead and dirt rained down their heads, down their backs, in between their gritted teeth, and caked around their eyes, Smoke replaced oxygen. They couldn't talk. They endured".

Because of the authors' dedication to detail and authenticity words like hooch, squid, fragging and gungy or acronyms like FAC, C-4, or 175's could leave those without a military background lost. Marlantes skillfully handles this problem with creating an easy to use "Glossary of Weapons, Technical Terms, Slangs and Jargon". He also includes a "Chain of Command" flow chart complete with radio call signs.

Marlantes's story telling capabilities evoke emotions not often accessed while reading a novel. Any reader of Matterhorn is advised to allow the story to completely envelope you in order for a true depth of understanding to take place.

Lastly, at the risk of revealing the allegorical tale mentioned earlier, it must be said that Marlantes does an exquisite job of showing the meaning of this tale. One must have compassion and live the honorable life instead of falling prey to evil. So "There it is".

- by Lorry Kaye, MA, LMHC



More like a screenplay than a novel
I'm afraid I'm going to have to differ with many of the reviews of Matterhorn. While the story is reasonably well written and somewhat compelling, it feels false in the end, more like a screenplay for Platoon or Full Metal Jacket than a novel that would rank alongside The Naked and the Dead or All Quiet on the Western Front. Better Viet Nam books, like The Things They Carried, have been written. I think the reason the book feels like a screen play is that simply too many things happen in too short order, and too many cliches play out. I'm not arguing whether or not Marine units or Army units had to retake the same hill over and over, or whether or not Marines were fighting against impossible odds and careless officers after rear echelon glory. All those things are true.

But Matterhorn gives us all this, and much, much more, in a very compact timeframe in an omniscient third person voice, as if we hover over and in the thoughts of many of the soldiers. The main character, Lt. Mellas, tries to hard to demonstrate his fairness, and has conflicting thoughts of abandoning his men and winning medals for valor. We listen to all of this play out in his head. It becomes a bit much at times, as does his discussions with Jackson or China, disaffected African-Americans in his platoon.

The rear echelon colonels and generals play out as MASH stereotypes, after glory and body counts with little regard for their men. The key colonel and his S-3, Major Blakely, subvert the wishes and commands of the general to use the company as bait and force the general's hand to fight in a place the Marines can't support with air power or artillery. Even in Viet Nam there were checks and balances in command!

Further, the book contains at least two instances of fragging a superior officer, events which did on rare occasion happen but never with this frequency. Even Mellas, the hero of the book, takes a shot at his commanding colonel, only to be disrupted at the last minute by another lieutenant. Some of these vignettes make the book seem more like a screenplay, as we are meant to hate the senior officers and are complicit in the fragging. The junior officers leading the company, Fitch and Hawke, are used up and cast aside. Fitch, doing everything he can to hold the platoon together, is transferred to a desk job by the colonel who needs more wins and more glory.

In this book, too much happens too quickly, and often with too much foreshadowing. I'll expect to see it rapidly converted into a movie much like Avatar, where the grunts are good and the officers are bad. It's too bad really, because there is a lot to like in this book, and a better editor would have slimmed it down and made it more focused.
- by Jeffrey Phillips "Innovation and Team Productivity Consultant"